should there be another jemalloc release
multisample at gmail.com
Tue Jan 20 16:38:12 PST 2015
>Regarding performance, I'm quite happy with the dev version of jemalloc.
It is significantly faster, and its memory layout refinements tend to
Please forgive me if this was covered before, I only check in from time to
time. Is there specific commit(s) or a link with a description of the
changes for that comment above. Specifically the memory layout refinements
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Jason Evans <jasone at canonware.com> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Rich Prohaska <prohaska7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is the head of the dev branch good for production?
> I tested the dev version of jemalloc pretty extensively in a production
> environment back in November. My experience (after fixing many
> regressions) was that it is stable, though it's likely that some subtle
> regressions have not yet surfaced. Additionally, I remain somewhat
> uncertain about the stability of the new heap profiling implementation, but
> I've fixed all the issues I'm aware of.
> Regarding performance, I'm quite happy with the dev version of jemalloc.
> It is significantly faster, and its memory layout refinements tend to
> decrease fragmentation.
> jemalloc-discuss mailing list
> jemalloc-discuss at canonware.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the jemalloc-discuss