benchmarks for jemalloc

[Jos Vernon]

Hi

Rather dependent on what you're doing I would have thought.

However one of my new/delete hungry tests takes 7.6 seconds using the default Windows new, 2.8 seconds using temalloc and 2.5 using jemalloc.

So that gives a flavour at least. :-)

Best Wishes

Jos

----------------------------------------------------------------------
jos vernon
http://www.websupergoo.com/
.NET Image Components & Consultancy
----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Yasaswini G 
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 10:07 PM
To: jemalloc-discuss at canonware.com 
Subject: benchmarks for jemalloc

Hi, 

Are there any benchmarks which can be used to compare jemalloc with other malloc implementations (glibc,...)
Any reference or guidance is highly appreciated


Thanks
Yasaswini 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
jemalloc-discuss mailing list
jemalloc-discuss at canonware.com
http://www.canonware.com/mailman/listinfo/jemalloc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://jemalloc.net/mailman/jemalloc-discuss/attachments/20160210/ab968a35/attachment.html>