should there be another jemalloc release

[Dave Barrett]

>Regarding performance, I'm quite happy with the dev version of jemalloc.
It is significantly faster, and its memory layout refinements tend to
decrease fragmentation.


 Please forgive me if this was covered before, I only check in from time to
time.   Is there specific commit(s) or a link with a description of the
changes for that comment above.  Specifically the memory layout refinements
?


Thanks,
-Dave



On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Jason Evans <jasone at canonware.com> wrote:

> On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Rich Prohaska <prohaska7 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is the head of the dev branch good for production?
>
> I tested the dev version of jemalloc pretty extensively in a production
> environment back in November.  My experience (after fixing many
> regressions) was that it is stable, though it's likely that some subtle
> regressions have not yet surfaced.  Additionally, I remain somewhat
> uncertain about the stability of the new heap profiling implementation, but
> I've fixed all the issues I'm aware of.
>
> Regarding performance, I'm quite happy with the dev version of jemalloc.
> It is significantly faster, and its memory layout refinements tend to
> decrease fragmentation.
>
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> jemalloc-discuss mailing list
> jemalloc-discuss at canonware.com
> http://www.canonware.com/mailman/listinfo/jemalloc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://jemalloc.net/mailman/jemalloc-discuss/attachments/20150120/81c24aba/attachment.html>